SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (84469)10/21/2000 10:37:14 AM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Thomas, Heartland serves to illustrate the dangers of credit excesses. mike



To: Thomas M. who wrote (84469)10/22/2000 7:06:35 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Thomas, A few years back, I pitched the idea of a modified Maximum Income Fund to several mutual fund cos. I say modified, because I couldn't use paired trading or most of the option spreads or short sales that I use in my non-fund portfolios. Also, I couldn't play the indices or currencies in a fund portfolio. However, I would use Treasury bonds and notes with either covered calls or spread conversions, stocks with covered calls or spread conversions, and, perhaps, deeply discounted closed end income funds.

Every fund co. came back with nearly exactly the same response: "high yield, true, but too much risk for our customers." I was dumbfounded as the same cos. readily put senior citizens, widows and orphans into the worst credits on the market to chase dubious current yields. I could have and did achieve much higher yields at much lower risk.

Anyhoo, to make a long story even longer, one of the firms that told me I was taking too much risk was Heartland.

The last time I checked, my Treasury and equity spreads have not had a 40-75% writeoff of principal. <VBG> My worst year beat their best years, by a multiple of three to four times. Oh, well, nobody said fund management companies had any brains.