Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (15419)	10/21/2000 7:29:33 PM
From: peter_luc	Respond to of 275872

"Will they go with too slow or too big?" ROTFLMAO!!! Peter

To: Dan3 who wrote (15419)	10/22/2000 1:17:34 AM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "Hmmm, Intel has two cores they could use - coppermine (too slow) or willamette (too big). Will they go with too slow or too big? And they'll still be 32 bit." You are WRONG on two counts !

To: Dan3 who wrote (15419)	10/22/2000 1:22:18 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "Even at .13 how many fewer than 50 dual core Willamettes will Intel be yielding per wafer? Too bad they'll have to compete with a dual 64 bit chip. OTOH, maybe Intel will put two Itanium cores on a chip - that should be easy to yield!" My, my, my, my my !!! So much confidence in a DUAL version of a 64 bit CPU that hasn't even been completely designed yet !! And don't forget 3Dan, - you were telling everybody that AMD would have Server SMP chip sets IN OEM SERVERS last August - and your Perfect AMD has now admitted the SMP chip set isn't even ready yet - and WON'TT BE READY until Q1 or Q2 of NEXT YEAR !! What a HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTT !!! Maybe that Dual x86-64 chip won't be as "punctual" as you'd like to believe !