SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (386)10/22/2000 11:32:17 PM
From: AhdaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
I think you misinterpreted what I meant
To try to simply things I will use two groups of people.
Within the first group of ten people are all laborers.
All ten have a base salary of 1000 per year.
One who we will refer to as lazy finds 1000 is not sufficient funds to live on. Lazy trots off to the government and ask for financial help and finds he can get it.
Three we shall refer to as the workers of the group who are making 2000 they are putting in more hours and finding they have a great deal more cash. They are not requiring aid but taking care of themselves.
Lazy chats with the the other six idlers frequently, due to the fact they all have free time. Lazy talks about how they can increase their living standard by receiving additional benefits from the government All seven are now receiving additional funds. Is this dishonest,lemmings or greed?

Precisely the same applies to those in group two. making 10000 per year. It could be a herd of cattle it could be windmills to generate power in the desert it could be oil it goes on and on property laws on self management deductions etc The purpose of all this is to shelter income so it will not have to be taxed.
Because we are social creature the end result again becomes dishonest lemmings or greed?

The system sanctifies both or they would not exist. Our system embraces all people. The laws and social squandering are very much part of it in all income levels. Now group two has thirteen members due to the three from group one that progressed.