Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (33849)	10/23/2000 10:01:41 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 42787

Mark Haines just tore apart Mary Meeker and another analyst on the basis that they were basicly pounding the table on the internet/tech stocks at the top. Mary's rebuttal was basicly the long-term view. As I have stated in the past, if an analyst cannot help their clients get out closer to an important TOP, there is no need for them. Lets go on the basis that all tough times will get worked out, as it was after the Depression and the bear market of the 1970 and after all smaller bear markets/phases. So lets say that eventually the market will continue up. Yes it is possible for long bear markets, but they too will end and with the spirit of us humans will bring us out of the duldrums - eventually. So do we need these high paying analysts to tell us, that if there is a bear market/big decline that eventually we will recover - just a matter of time. WE ALL KNOW THAT ALREADY. We need analysts to help people get out near highs and buy at lows, not tell us that eventually - if one can hold on long enough the market will come back. REPEAT - WE KNOW THAT ALREADY!!!!!!! These analyst will continue to do what they are doing until the public speaks out enough. In that respect I compliment MARK HAINES on his firm approach to Mary Meeker and the other analyst.