Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30514)	10/23/2000 3:29:35 PM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

The most blatent form of manipulation I have seen was the prior Thursday. As I noted on the Cisco thread, level II showed Goldman Sachs was sitting on the bid and literally ate MILLIONS of shares of Cisco at $50 per share. All day long they seemed to be "the one" that was determined not to let Cisco drop below $50. Was it any surprise that the very next day Goldman wheeled out Abby to tell the sheeple that the markets were 15% undervalued and Crisco rallied $5 that day? BTW- What if Abby would have lost her touch and Goldman was stuck with all those shares it had to unload? I'm not suggesting that Goldman itself ate all the shares, but they were eating soooo many that day that clearly something was up, as I noted on the Cisco thread. Next time I'll know they're planning to wheel out Abby the next day. -ggg-