Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : KEMET Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SJS who wrote (757)	10/23/2000 5:02:17 PM
From: techtonicbull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 906

I get a conflicting read on that. I thought that the company said 5 -10 % for fiscal 2001 and 15 to 20 % for fiscal 2002. I see they are lowering the ask price which was 30 1/2 to 29. Any way you slice I though the stock did very well and there will be upward momentum going forward. So will this be the chance to unload? I think not this still looks very promising to me.

To: SJS who wrote (757)	10/23/2000 5:09:02 PM
From: All Mtn Ski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 906

"Looking ahead, we expect revenues to continue to grow in the range of 5-10% over the remainder of fiscal year 2001. This growth should come from a combination of volume, product mix, and price increases." FY 2001 ends in March, so he is basically saying revs will grow for the next 2 quarters. I read this as sequential rev growth. Notice that earnings grew 20% sequentially and revs grew 10%, that means operating margins are expanding. "Overall, we are comfortable with the range of analysts' current consensus estimates for the balance of fiscal year 2001. We expect to see growth in revenues of approximately 15-20% for fiscal year 2002 when compared with fiscal year 2001...." This should appease the worry-warts, who thought business would slow down tomorrow. Overall a good report, that may need some clarification in the CC with regards to sequential rev growth in the coming quarters. Cheers, Tom