SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Arbitrage Plays -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Allen Furlan who wrote (264)10/23/2000 5:18:41 PM
From: Mark Ivan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 376
 
Allen,

You are correct of course. If the deal is a no-go, you can lose BIG. And since the play seems so good still, one would assume that the risk is high.

I actually know nothing of the deal. I was merely pointing out to David that to "plug my life savings into TGP" as he put it, may still be a bad idea, even if the deal goes thru. In these types of play, one must hedge by shorting the other side so that you are truly playing the arbitrage and are immune to market swings.

Mark



To: Allen Furlan who wrote (264)10/24/2000 4:09:32 PM
From: David Lee Smith  Respond to of 376
 
I did some research into this idea. There was a bill to prohibit tax-free exchanges or mergers between REITs and non-REITs that died and it's not likely to resurface as an issue. On the other hand, PCL actually got a favorable letter ruling from the IRS to change from a MLP to a REIT to enable a tax-free merger into TGP. The merger is contingent upon a favorable letter ruling from the IRS on the tax-free status of the merger. This deal has been in the hopper since early 1999, and it has some very high powered attorneys and financial advisors (including Goldman Sachs) that have looked at the deal and its tax consequences. A negative letter ruling would be making new law, something the IRS is loath to do. I expect a favorable letter ruling from the IRS and a deal that gets done.



To: Allen Furlan who wrote (264)10/26/2000 9:47:36 AM
From: Keith J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 376
 
Shorted WCOM this morning at 22 13/16 (unbelievable that it's this low), and went long ICIX at 20 1/2. Ratio is 1.1872 shares of WCOM per share of ICIX. Deal expected to close early next year.

KJ