Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (51240)	10/24/2000 2:13:52 AM
From: Mr. Whist	Respond to of 769670

Superb post. Excellent analysis.

To: PartyTime who wrote (51240)	10/24/2000 2:21:23 AM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The current administration was at the helm during record prosperity, low unemployment, no major war, budget surpluses, etc. Surely they must be punished. Oh I forgot, it was Reagan's economic policies, that Bush's daddy called voodoo economics, that were responsible. It just took a little time. I'm all in favor of weekly blowjobs for whoever becomes president if it is good for the economy. It should be one of the perks for a job well done. Del

To: PartyTime who wrote (51240)	10/24/2000 2:27:42 AM
From: Alex Mt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The real Latin America? -- Did you ever bother to check what they think of Gore? Check this out: ran.org

To: PartyTime who wrote (51240)	10/24/2000 4:03:01 AM
From: Joseph F. Hubel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You got an awful lot presumptive mileage out of my one small paragraph on old anti drug efforts. Brief as it was and off topic to your reply, you found it a sufficient spring board to launch another diatribe full of rhetoric, platitudes and crafted statements emphasizing why you can't conceive of anyone not being in love with your man Gore. As much as it may be unthinkable for you, there does exist differing opinion that has defied your marathon effort to convert. It must be difficult in spite of possessing what you believe to be overwhelming evidence supporting him, still roughly half of this country's electorate want nothing to do with the man. It could be as simple as not being able to stomach the guy or having to look at his face for another four years. Or it could be a belief in something different or something believed better. You play loose with reality, yet wonder why people don't buy into your superior argument. I respond to half truths or misleading statements but I don't give a whit who you vote for and am not interested in changing your position. The term "rabid" has been used often referring to members of this thread who do not support your man, from my perspective, your own zeal is too much for my taste. Perhaps it stems from the Gore school of debate. JFH