SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MythMan who wrote (30647)10/24/2000 10:37:55 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
<I think the productivity gains are closer to the high end than the low end that folks like Grant talk about.>

But by what argument?? Can you think of one argument supporting an adjustment by BLS? If not, I think you have to go with Grant's numbers. JMO

DAK



To: MythMan who wrote (30647)10/24/2000 10:38:28 AM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
MM, oh ye of little faith. I promise you tough love IN SIZE. Sounds like you need one of skeeter's therapy sessions for bears. The most difficult part of the timing of TL & EV is that AG & co. have fostered a bubble unprecedented in scope and I believe operations behind the scene help to maintain the bubble. Nonetheless they are doomed to fail. The bigger the boom the bigger the bust. I forecast the year 2001 will be the year of TOUGH LOVE! ( in size!)watch da buck ! Mike ho ho ho



To: MythMan who wrote (30647)10/24/2000 10:55:16 AM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 436258
 
MM:

The good doctor does tend to take the bone in his teeth and shake it to death, but there can be no question that he has systematically shredded the BLS BS. He also does so with facts and figures that are well researched. Until somebody better comes along, it is hard to fault his work.

Personally, I think the U.S. stats are a joke. There have been some 32 revisions to the methods used to calculate inflation in the U.S. over the last few years. Every one of them reduces the inflation rate. Most of these methods are hare-brained.

Take a look at how the productivity stats are calculated,.... especially as it relates to hedonic pricing (especially in PCs) and you will break out laughing.

Sure there have been productivity gains, but nowhere near what the stats suggest. Profits, which are generally falling, also suggest that the stats are exaggerated.
Best, Earlie



To: MythMan who wrote (30647)10/24/2000 11:00:43 AM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Let's not talk about productivity gains in the abstract. I don't deny that there have been productivity gains, but could you please provide some concrete examples?