Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (15728)	10/24/2000 1:54:17 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 275872

RE:"The P4/gigamine numbers indicate some bandwidth benefit for QIII, but not to the same degree that the SpecFP and Stream numbers benefit." This is likely true. Which the master himself, Paul, is baiting us about P4s Quake III scores... Jim

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (15728)	10/24/2000 1:54:27 PM
From: jcholewa	Respond to of 275872

> Er, it may be "bloody obvious", but the string of comparisons here is a bit noisy. Anand's gigamine QIII scored > didn't use the OR840, which does look good on bandwidth dependent things. Maybe the P4/gigamine comparison > numbers did, maybe they didn't. The P4/gigamine numbers indicate some bandwidth benefit for QIII, but not to the same > degree that the SpecFP and Stream numbers benefit. Yeah, but my point was: Cause: DDR SDRAM shows better performance in Quake III than PC133 SDRAM on the PIII Effect: DDR SDRAM will show better performance in Quake III than PC133 SDRAM on the Athlon. This, imho, is pretty clear cut a point.     -JC