SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mad2 who wrote (3148)10/25/2000 9:52:43 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3543
 
Friday September 22, 10:50 am Eastern Time
MotleyFool.com - Fool News
Cable & Wireless' Raw Deal
By Bill Mann

From the files of "I knew it, I knew it":

Yesterday Cable & Wireless (NYSE: CWP - news) announced that it was selling a 4.9% stake in Pacific Century Cyberworks (NYSE: PCW - news) at a market price of about HK$9.88 per share (U.S.$1.28), for a total of U.S.$1.3 billion. Cable & Wireless still holds approximately 15.3% of PCCW as a result of PCCW's purchase of Hong Kong Telecom from Cable & Wireless in August.

The deal between the two companies was part cash and part stock, with Cable & Wireless getting U.S.$11.3 billion in cash plus a stake in PCCW that turned out to be 21.4%. C&W then flipped a small portion of its PCCW stake in a stock swap with CMGI (Nasdaq: CMGI - news) for its shares, leaving it with a 20.2% stake. The trouble is, shares in PCCW have fallen so fast since the deal was inked in February that Cable & Wireless' current yield is 23% less than the market price for Hong Kong Tel as of the market close on the day the deal was announced. PCCW's shares have dropped from HK$26.35 per share (U.S.$3.41) down to HK$8.81 (U.S.$1.14) as the euphoria that surrounded it has dulled significantly.

I wish I hadn't seen this coming. At the time of the PCCW deal, there was another offer to Cable & Wireless on the table, an all-cash deal from Singapore Telecom. Although PCCW's plans were ambitious, the company had little in the way of revenues or of assets to back up its proposal to take over the former monopoly carrier of Hong Kong, which C&W was trying to sell. Nothing except for its fluffed-up stock certificates, made buoyant by the combination of a magical name (founder Richard Li), an audacious business plan involving the Internet and Asia, some pretty sweet deals from the Hong Kong government, and an investing public dying to believe.

C&W was trying to get out of Hong Kong. It should have taken the cash deal from SingTel. But no, it was bedazzled by the same sparkle that helped PCCW catch the fancy of the market. And so it took a cash and stock deal with limitations on when it could sell the stock. But when would C&W possibly find reason to sell such a fantastic opportunity as ownership in PCCW?

Not soon enough, apparently. C&W has embargoes placed on its sale of the PCCW stock, with the first 25% having just unlocked. C&W wasted no time at all to unload it. This leaves another 15% of all available PCCW shares in the hands of a company that is now demonstrably a motivated seller -- a situation that is bad for both parties. Half of the remaining shares unlock in February 2001, the remainder six months after that.

As a Cable & Wireless shareholder, I stated from the outset that it should take the bird in hand -- SingTel's cash. Instead, we're now loaded down with a bunch of PCCW funny money stock, with PCCW loaded down with debt from the transaction, debt assumed from Hong Kong Tel, and the debt it has incurred to start up its own business.

Something tells me this story's going to get uglier before it gets better. Those who are deeply interested in a skeptic's take on the PCCW saga should check out the recent article about it at Webb-site, which is run by a former investment banker based in Hong Kong who has a passion for good corporate governance. Very Foolish!