Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30812)	10/24/2000 3:51:53 PM
From: ild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Yeah, I agree. If NAZ goes to 500 no one would buy. -g- I think that at the moment all SA gold miners are valued at their book value. Hopefully you and I will still be around to see the position changed: tech valued at book value and gold stocks valued at their reserves.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30812)	10/24/2000 3:54:41 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 436258

Heinz: Been mostly on the sidelines and enjoying the "spectating", but joined the fray for a bit this PM. I suspect that NT may not thrill its investors with its numbers, due I believe, this P.M. Near term puts are not too extremely priced for a short term spec. Just a small dollup, for comfort while we peruse the report. (g) If I am accurate, their numbers might also nudge folks who have not as yet thought through the implications of a slowing telecom sector for contract producers like CLS, An "over-nighter" here is appealing at this end. (g) AMZN will try, but may experience difficulty "spinning" its numbers, especially as the debt becomes ever more overwhelming. So a teaspoonful of that one for the next short while (short or puts of course). (g) Best, Earlie