SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GerPol who wrote (12343)10/25/2000 10:08:52 AM
From: LowtherAcademy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
"What blue blood scam r u runnin !".
Sir, I resent your inference. I suggest you take your
common and base accusations and depart.
I find your tone to be offensive and loutish.
Good day to you!
Slam



To: GerPol who wrote (12343)10/25/2000 1:42:42 PM
From: Gulo  Respond to of 15703
 
OT - >Geeehhhhhzzz you'll buy into any advertising campaign.

What campaign would that be?
No. I'm the one that is NOT buying. YOU bought the line hook, line and sinker. The main U.N. criterion that bumped us to the top is 'equitable redistribution of wealth'. I happen to disagree that redistribution of 55% of my income is 'equitable'.

>Amazing how you narrow minded red necks think only hard working people get ahead.
Where did I say that? In fact the opposite is too often true - hard working people can't get ahead because of the punitive tax regime in this country.

Why do you label me a 'redneck' because I want to keep some of my earnings? I thought the term referred to intolerant simpletons, not to a person that simply seeks a bit of tolerance for their own rights. You sure are quick to judge.

For what its worth, my average income put me well below the 'poverty level' over most of my life. I've had years where I had to live on rice and potatoes. Although I appreciated support I got from various sources, never did I feel that stealing someone elses' income was the solution.

Let's take this to a more appropriate thread:
Subject 37211
-g