SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (126808)10/25/2000 2:36:33 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577842
 
Ted,

Why do you think Intel is dropping the prices again (per the Register) on their high Mhz P4 chips?

Message 14251801

Joe



To: tejek who wrote (126808)10/25/2000 2:59:25 PM
From: Gopher Broke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577842
 
Its not an issue of competition...so they should be treated as a one of a kind. Yet, they are being discounted.

Why do you say it is not an issue of competition? We have seen the P4 benchmarks. There is a low-risk high-performing alternative from a company that has not screwed the OEMs in the recent past by supplying them with bad chipsets and processors. It is not surprising to me that the OEMs with the strongest quarter (CPQ, GTW) have a high mix of AMD processors to get a bigger profit margin. So why should they stick their neck out adopting what they see as a "niche product".



To: tejek who wrote (126808)10/25/2000 3:00:32 PM
From: EricRR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577842
 
Why do you think Intel is dropping the prices again (per the Register) on their high Mhz P4 chips?


Because they will be more profitable for Intel. <g>

Or

Because Dell will be the only ones getting them in volume and they threatened to go AMD again. (IMO)

GO to HP's web site, 1GHz P3 is AWOL. It's athlon, athlon, athlon. Compaq reports that 50% of consumer sales are AMD. Intel needs a cheap P4 for diplomatic reasons.