Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (38776)	10/25/2000 4:08:17 PM
From: Alan Siegal	Respond to of 70976

I've felt for quite some time that your name ['Sun'] and your posts (every last one of them) are completely incompatible. ???

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (38776)	10/25/2000 4:20:17 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 70976

??? Not quite your lead (perhaps your....hubris?) Thanks. I take that as a complement. Although all my hubris was ironed out by the market. If I believed in the doom, I'd be short (which sadly I have not been). As it stands I just try to bring some balance to a very one sided thread. ST

To: scott_jiminez who wrote (38776)	10/25/2000 5:10:36 PM
From: mitch-c	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

Hey ... let's chill the ad hominem stuff. I can disagree with folks here (on AMAT or other subjects) while respecting their points of view. I suggest the same to others. Markets exist BECAUSE people think differently. For example, Cary may be close to my opposite politically, but he and Jacob have been more correct recently about where AMAT was headed than I was (at least short term ... <g>). We'd be foolish to ignore that. In fact, I think I recently spent an entire message agreeing with Jacob that AMAT was poised to move - somewhere. He has a strongly disciplined AMAT strategy; I have a different and flexible one. That's variety, not a reason for us to sling insults. Results count. Namecalling doesn't. Let it go. - Mitch