Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (114952)	10/26/2000 2:09:03 AM
From: dmf	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Hi Amy, OT? I'm learning here. Thanks for the QOQ Product Revenue information for Sun. As you said: Q101 4,242 Q400 4,327 Flat sequentially Previous Product Revenues: Q300 3,429 Q200 2,997 Q100 2,668 Q499 3,047 Q399 2,547 Q299 2,403 Note that last year, product revenues were actually down from Q499 to Q100. Product Revenues in 2001 will reflect the transition to the UltraSPARC(TM) III microprocessor. Is it reasonable to expect subsequent 2001 quarters will show increased product revenues as were shown in 1999 and 2000? I'm interested in what you think, or what Tony, GVT and others think about the numbers. This may seem off topic but we all know Intel is going after Sun's market so it isn't entirely irrelevant. Just trying to follow up on previous comments about QOQ results. Willing, and thankful, to learn from those of you who can help. dmf