SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (38874)10/26/2000 8:47:52 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 70976
 
Cary,

I agree that AMAT should get into the lithography market in a big way; ASML would be the prime candidate IMHO.

As for where we are headed, I think it would be quite arrogant for anyone to say definitively where AMAT will be 10 or 20 years hence. As IC's increase their penetration into everyday products, and those products become cheaper to buy and therefore more available to the masses, the limit is only that of an engineer's imagination. This is not pie-in-the-sky thinking; we are seeing it now with cell phones, MP3 players etc.

How many people 10 years ago said we would hit a wall at .25 microns?

Predicting where technology is ultimately headed usually only has one end effect; that of making the predictor look more foolish than a Dial-A-Psychic.

Brian



To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (38874)10/26/2000 9:08:17 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
re: a AMAT/ASML merger could eventually capture 70-80% of the market.:

Wonder what the Justice Dept. would think of that? We know they are sniffing around AMAT already.

I remember some straight-line extrapolations, on MSFT (back when it was a MustOwn stock), which took the previous growth rate (in the stock and/or EPS), the current PE (and/or stock price), and extrapolated out a few years, ending up with a market cap bigger the the U.S. GDP. And lots of people took those calculations, and those future stock prices, seriously. Fewer, today.



To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (38874)10/26/2000 11:27:07 PM
From: Lone Star  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
What you say is true, and I am watchful not to fall in love with the damsel that ran at ~35%CAGR for 12 years. But I don't expect the same return and am satified with 20-25%, and I feel my risk is low and sleep well.
I have picked a budding gorilla in a different field as my next speculative hold for 5-10 yeras.