SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : T/FIF, a New Plateau -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (287)10/27/2000 10:07:17 AM
From: PuddleGlum  Respond to of 2243
 
Do I think they're bargains? Can't honestly say that I do. In the biotech sector I haven't had much success finding bargains. I just try to find good technology, and for that I rely a good deal on you and Peter and V1.

pg



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (287)10/28/2000 6:45:36 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2243
 
I like to compare this type of company to INCY. Price to
"sales" is 12 at INCY. That's a factor of 20, for twice the
market cap.


Interesting, PG.... exactly the same point was made in
this new (to me, at least) email newsletter, The Bull Market
Biotech Investor (http://www.BullMarket.com)).......

2. RELATIVE VALUES OF THE CHIP ARRAY PROVIDERS

Affymetrix’s management and employees must have hunkered down in the
third
quarter to bring the company to a break-even point with respect to
earnings. Following the earnings announcement, the stock price gained
32%
on 8 million shares: over five times the average daily volume. The
interesting aspect is that up until 2Q00 earnings were announced,
Affymetrix had been considered a blue chip of the Biotech sector and the
stock was performing well. However, at the announcement of 2Q00
earnings,
the company posted a greater-than-expected loss and the stock price
declined by as much as 50%. It has been a difficult ride for
shareholders
because many of the sector’s blue chip stocks have advanced by 50% or
more
this year. With the positive earnings report and Wednesday’s gain in
share price, it is worthwhile to examine some of the valuations among
the
providers of chip arrays and to see how Affymetrix stacks up.

The chart below shows the last trading price (Close), market cap (Cap),
price-to-sales ratio (Pr/Sa) and cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities (Cash) for each security. For the Pr/Sa calculation, the
sales
are projected for this year and are not trailing twelve-month sales.
The
table should be viewed with the courier font.

Close Cap Pr/Sa Cash

Affymetrix AFFX $68 $3800M 19 $430M
Incyte Genomics INCY 36 2300 12 640
Sequenom SQNM 35 850 106 151
Illumina ILMN 36 830 410 122
Gene Logic GLGC 22 550 20 242
Hyseq HYSQ 30 390 28 260
Nanogen NGEN 16 320 36 100

The above table lists the companies according to market cap; however,
the
point is to understand how the market cap relates to annual sales
(Pr/Sa).
The market cap, derived from the number of outstanding shares multiplied
by the share price, is the value that investors have put on the stock.
The lower the market cap, in comparison to annual sales, the lower the
price-to-sales ratio and the better the value. Remember though, this is
only one simple means to find relative values among these stocks, and
this
does not take varying profit margins into account.

In the above table, the stocks with the lowest price-to-sales ratio are
Affymetrix and Incyte Genomics; these companies provide the best value
according to this simple example. They also happen to possess the most
cash and have significant annual sales. In fact, Incyte Genomics is
quite
undervalued in comparison to shares of Affymetrix. If investors
continue
to push up Affymetrix’s price, it will be interesting to see whether or
not Incyte’s shares also increase. The stocks with the highest
price-to-sales ratio are Illumina and Sequenom. Both of these companies
are rather newly established and so it is understandable that their
price-to-sales ratios are high because annual sales are quite low. In
tough market conditions, it is more likely to see stocks with high
price-to-sales ratios fall in price, while stocks with lower
price-to-sales ratios tend to fare better.


It was in Thursday's edition. I like their commentary as a
general rule. It's the first letter of this sort that I've
actually subscribed to (pointer from Stefaan).