Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ausdauer who wrote (16149)	10/27/2000 2:59:02 PM
From: Steve 667	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 60323

Aus, Thanks for the info. Your previous post on Lexar's multiple position disorder reminds me of a renowned Texas criminal defense lawyer named Richard "Racehorse" Haynes. Haynes explained how, in defending a client against a criminal charge, he never relied on just a single defense argument. Haynes' explanation of his method went something like this: "Let's say that your neighbor sues you, claiming that your dog bit him at such-and-such a time and place. I will place three arguments before the jury, as follows: Number one, my client's dog doesn't bite. Number two, my client and his dog were seen at a far-distant event on the day of the alleged bite. And, number three . . . my client doesn't have a dog!" Sound like Lexar's legal strategy? The only thing that bothers me is that Racehorse Haynes was well known for winning his cases. Let's hope the similarity ends before that happens. Steve 667 Only 2 1/2 shopping days left