Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (2838)	10/27/2000 8:50:29 PM
From: E	Respond to of 28931

I leave to our co-thread members to judge whether your use of "admissions" -- for just one emblem example -- was value-neutral, and did not imply that I had something to admit. I gave up completely on the subtler issues, in our argument, and on the more expansive ones. I gave up discussing religion. Arguing with you has been a lot like trying to nail jello to a board. <<Why can't you ask me what I meant by the word "admission">> Because I know what everyone means by it, and why they sometimes use it instead of "statement." I didn't admit. Actually, I didn't acknowledge, either. I said, consistently with what I have always said. The devil is (sometimes most obvious) in the detail. I would certainly not have engaged in this exercise had realized its hopelessness. I don't think you are obtuse. I think you write what you mean to.