Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Day trading in Canada -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eva who wrote (4302)	10/28/2000 11:57:27 AM
From: Nick Morvay	Respond to of 4467

It is true that the smaller the pitch the greater ability for sharpness. However, for text the difference between .27 and .22 pitch will not be noticeable, given all other factors (resolution, scan rates, non-interlaced, focus) are the same. My 21" NEC P1250+ monitors have .27 pitch and run them at 1600x1200 resolution. The focus or sharpness of the characters is excellent at all locations on the screen. When comparing monitors, look at the sharpness of the characters as you move closer to the edges of the screen. The more consistent the sharpness at all locations the better the monitor. This will reduce eye-train. The other factor is the refresh rate of the screen. The higher scan rates will reduce flicker and that is also a major cause of eye-strain. Vertical rates of 85Hz and above are excellent. Your video card also has to be able to perform at these scan rates. Color convergence (the 3 primary colors to be focused on one spot) is another factor affecting sharpness, particularly as you move away from the cetre of the screen. A good monitor will maintain convergence across all locations on the screen. Most articles don't pay attention this factor, but from a prior life as a TV repair technician, it is a known factor. Try this link for a description on display quality: millbury.k12.ma.us