SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (86858)10/28/2000 6:54:25 PM
From: CharleyMike  Respond to of 108807
 
It appears to me that you are reading into the news instead of out of the news. Since I have no preference for either side (they're all savages) I went back to your link and read the story again, twice.

That specific article does not say he was shot by Israelis.

It does say:"In Saturday's clashes, involving hundreds of Palestinian protesters, the two sides exchanged gunfire.

When both sides are firing automatic weapons, only the person aiming that weapon can know MAYBE who/what he hit.

Both sides blame the other, not just this incident, but most of the incidents.

THEY'RE BOTH WRONG, THEY'RE BOTH KILLERS OF INNOCENTS, THEY'RE ALL SAVAGES OPERATING UNDER MISTAKEN CONCLUSIONS.

WERE I GOD OF/TO EITHER, OR BOTH, I'D DISOWN THEM ALL.



To: Ilaine who wrote (86858)10/28/2000 9:32:14 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
What is in dispute is the cameraman said the Palestinians fired across the intersection for just the first few minutes. He said the rest of the shooting came from the Israelis, and that the Palestinians did not fire back because they had run out of bullets. Israel disputed that claim, but acknowledged the boy was killed by Israeli gunfire. A minor point, not justified by the teaser in the headline.

Brill's is supposed to be the watchdog of the media, but I think they chose to deliberately muddy the waters on this one. Much of the media engages in anti-Arab bigotry and I've about had my fill of it. This Charley Reese column hits the nail on the head.



Racism, bigotry bad for all
Charley Reese
Commentary

Published in The Orlando Sentinel on October 24, 2000

In these politically correct days, all of us are supposed to refrain from being racist bigots, right? Then how come so many Americans believe that it's OK to be a racist bigot when it comes to Arabs and Muslims?

Ric Keller, running for the U.S. House of Representatives in Florida's eighth district, which includes Orlando, got carried away recently and said the Palestinians who killed two armed Israeli undercover agents are "lower than pond scum."

Well, I have one question, Mr. Keller. Do you have the guts to stand up in public and say that the Jewish settlers who lynched a Palestinian -- they gouged out his eyes, broke both arms, fractured his skull and set him on fire -- are "lower than pond scum?"

If you don't, you don't deserve the vote of any decent American. You are just another cowardly panderer. None of my Palestinian friends condones the killing of the two Israelis, even though, unlike the Palestinian, the Israelis were armed. But if it's brutality you're against, then you have to be against it no matter which side commits it.

Don Imus, the radio pseudo-iconoclast, referred to Yasser Arafat as a "rag head." Well, Mr. Imus, if you feel free to call Arabs rag heads, do you think that Jews or black people should be called derogatory names? Why do you think that Arabs are exempt from common decency?

Rod Dreher, a New York Post writer, asserted that Israel was the only outpost of Western civilization "in that savage and irrational desert." Well, Mr. Dreher should study history. Most of Western Europe's knowledge of the classical society came from Arabs who preserved the texts of ancient Greeks and Romans.

Franklin Graham, Billy Graham's son, repeats the old canard that Arabs hate all Jews. Well, once more, consult history. When Jews fled Christian persecution in Europe, where did they go to find sanctuary?

The Islamic countries. Arabs don't hate Jews. Jews, Christians and Muslims have lived together in the same countries for centuries. Arabs are, by the way, also the "seed of Abraham."

The dispute with the Israelis is over territory not religion. No less a man than a leader of Hamas reminded a caller, who asked how Hamas would treat Christians, that Islam teaches that Muslims must treat Christians as they would treat themselves.

Columnist Cal Thomas, who must be a Christian Zionist, warns that Muslims are a threat to Americans. Wake up, Cal, and read something besides Zionist propaganda. Muslims have been part of America since the 1800s, and, so far as I know, we Christians have done the killing in North America.

And, Cal, if you visit an Arab city, your hotel clerk won't have to warn you to stay out of certain neighborhoods. There is far more crime in our cities than in theirs.

Islam has been greatly distorted, and the propaganda campaign seems to be intensifying, probably to divert attention from Israeli brutality.

Needless to say, most Americans are as ignorant of Arab history and culture as they are of their own. In Jerusalem, the keys to Christianity's holy site were entrusted to Muslims.

There is only one point on which I agree with the politically correct types, and that is that racism and bigotry should be condemned. But when you exclude Arabs and Muslims and feel free publicly to insult, stereotype and distort their culture and their religion, you are really telling the world that you are a hypocrite. You are, in fact, a racist bigot and ignorant, to boot.









orlandosentinel.com