Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (2888)	10/28/2000 12:49:22 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Maybe He didn't talk about it because it didn't come up. I have no idea. I think it's strange to say that because He didn't talk about it He must support it. I don't consider that to be a particularly compelling argument. As I quoted to you earlier, the Christians that proselytized in his name, and who created the gospel base for Christianity, did support slavery in the name of Christ. What could be clearer? And you don't find negligence in the supposed Son of God for not saying anything to humanity about the scourge of slavery? In our civilized world we sue people for not acting in a reasonable manner to prevent injury or harm. You find it reasonable to exclude Jesus from reasonableness in the concern of millions of deaths? When I pointed out his hatred of gentiles you said nothing. When I point out that he turned a blind eye to slavery you say nothing. I don't understand why you defend this behaviour??