Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mad2 who wrote (2946)	10/29/2000 1:21:10 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Yeah, but I'm mad too. {:o)

To: Mad2 who wrote (2946)	10/29/2000 5:31:07 PM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Good Grief Mad2, I go away for the weekend on a hunting trip only to return to over 54 posts! Don't you get it by now? The only way any rational person could look upon GUMM as a sound investment is if they are either 1) incredibly naive (ie stupid) or 2) paid Shill's. Since all of the three Stooges claim to have numerous graduate degree's from top universities, I leave up to our dedicated readers to guess which of the above possibilities is likely to be true. I especially find it hilarious that Danny "The Shill" is now claiming that QGLY is nothing like GUMM because they don't make gum. Considering that GUMM's gum business is the biggest money loser of them all, I'm sure that QGLY management must be very thankful for this. To Danny Boy- yes I left out the meaningless statement about GUMM's gum business because it is absolutely meaningless and relies on (as usual) predictions about events that haven't even come close to fruition yet. A better topic of discussion at this point might be trying to decide when to cover this POS. My guess is that it will bottom out around $7 or $8 and then slowly trail off to the $5 range. Any read on this?