Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JC Jaros who wrote (52382)	10/29/2000 1:42:49 PM
From: Yaacov	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

JC, what your doing on this thread? ggg

To: JC Jaros who wrote (52382)	10/29/2000 2:34:54 PM
From: Thunder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

And a 'President' Bush is going to end this Microsoft prosecution/verdict just as soon as he's sworn in because Microsoft (and co.) were big contributors to his campaign? --- You're a pretty sophisticated investor. (IMO) -JCJ The implication was from my understanding, JCJ, that the Bush statement was indicative of his stance when it comes to antitrust. It would be wise to assume that he will not drop the case while at the Appellate level. Beyond that he sure might. As I have pointed out on countless occasions before, a settlement constructive to Microsoft's management would be in all likelihood, a sure deal under a GWB administration. It should be added that, un-countered 'big contributions' is in part, what brought about this mess to some; and a dream for others. Sophisticated investor? Well thanks, I think. <g> It seems that your leanings are more in line with Ralph Nader, who seems to be a very sincere, honest man who is full of conviction to his beliefs. So for EVERYONES sake, please do vote for him. I'd really appreciate it, I mean REALLY! <vbg>