Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (52386)	10/29/2000 3:13:24 PM
From: Thunder	Respond to of 74651

I'm just trying to understand at what point (if any) you'll admit Microsoft has lost. Well Charles, whether or not you see it now, we have all lost something and gained through this as well, already. The point of admittance for me would be if they were found to be guilty after full due process. I can live with that. Of course we can expect an opposite admittance, along with an apology upon exoneration too, from the plaintiff, right? Oh sure. <g>

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (52386)	10/30/2000 12:10:53 AM
From: Richard Nehrboss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Mr. Tutt, Just an FYI: RE "or fails to reverse an Appellate decision " In our justice system, I don't believe a plaintiff can take their case to a higher court. Therefore, if the Appellate court rules in favor of MSFT, that's the end of this egregious waste of taxpayer money. Richard

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (52386)	10/30/2000 12:29:40 PM
From: sandeep	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Charles, I am sure that if the appeals court+supreme court rule against microsoft, I would consider that microsoft did something which is against the existing laws, not incorrect, but against laws regardless. Now what would you say if the courts decide in Microsoft's favor or if there is a settlement (because govt believes that its earlier attempts were misguided and that they are likely to lose in the appeals court) ? I am just trying to understand at what point (if any) you'll admit Microsoft has won. JMHO Sandeep