SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis for Macintosh Users -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (784)10/30/2000 5:19:51 PM
From: LastShadow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1541
 
I'm not sure that I have ever had all tvs running, but there is one in each of the 4 bedrooms, one in the library, two in the basement, and one in the great room. the most we have ever had on at one time is 4, running on 4 different channels, two of which ere premium or pay-per-view...this is a bit odd I suppose, but i don'twatch tv except for the nat'l news.

The cable modem carrier signal is not affected by the number of tv's, however, as that is a completely separate waveform, so however many tvs tyou have running is immaterial. What I didnotice at the last place (beforethe move) was that as the neighborhood became saturated with more cable modem users, performance did degrade somewhat. I suspect the same thing will happen eventually in the new sub, although if you look at the amount of data a half dozen computers carrying even streaming data is, it isn't really much bandwidth.

CAT 5 cable, which is used for both phone and ethernet in the house, has the ability to carry two cable modem lines, or 4 telephone numbers (the guy wiring the place didn't know about the computers, and wanted to know why I needed 12 different phone lines in each of the rooms - lol). however, I ran each computer as a "home run" - that is it is point to point to the hub, rather than sharing lines, and that does make a performance/interference reduction difference.

ls