SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougSF30 who wrote (16819)10/30/2000 6:33:49 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Doug,

Not sure what opportunity has really been missed... 760 revenues (themselves) are trivial.

At $39, 760 brings more revenue than K6.

Joe



To: dougSF30 who wrote (16819)10/30/2000 6:41:51 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Doug, Re: They want ALi or VIA, or whoever, to handle the chipset stuff.

Personally I don't like that strategy. AMD is too dependent by other companies with their own agendas by doing that. Since AMD doesn't manufacturers their chipsets themselves they don't fill fab capacity and give some nice additional million dollars to the bottom line. What's the disadvantage in continuing to manufacture and sell them? You could argue with development time which could be used better. But to "seed" the market AMD still needs to develop these chipsets so this wouldn't make a big different either. Just look at AMD's earning statements for the last few quarters. You will notice that "other income" went down significantly from Q1 over Q2 to Q3 -- that's because they did sell less and less Irongate chipsets then.

If there were a flood of 760 boards available now, would there be enough PC 2100 memory to go around?

Probably not. But what's better: No memory and no motherboards, or only no memory? These 760 boards could still be used with PC1600 memory and even if no OEM would adopt them enthusiasts and screw-driver shops would love to build systems with DDR. In these markets AMD could probably have sold several 100.000 units more in Q4 (just look at the Duron sales in Q3 with virtually no first tier OEMs selling them).

Andreas



To: dougSF30 who wrote (16819)10/30/2000 9:30:00 PM
From: tejekRespond to of 275872
 
Not sure what opportunity has really been missed... 760 revenues (themselves) are trivial. I doubt this will impact CPU sales, assuming AMD judges the 266 FSB CPU demand accurately. (presumably this sort of thing (multiplier and bus speed) can be set late in the process)

Doug,

I agree....aren't Athlons all sold out this quarter?

ted