Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (85191)	10/30/2000 8:57:36 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

What did you buy it for 1st? eom.

To: marginmike who wrote (85191)	10/30/2000 9:39:01 PM
From: jazzcat2000	Respond to of 152472

If I'm not mistaken, M/L had an intermediate-term "neutral" on GSTRF before today. Guess what their intermediate-term rating is on QCOM----"NEUTRAL". M/L just plain sucks. Their analyst, Michael Ching has nothing between his legs.

To: marginmike who wrote (85191)	10/31/2000 5:57:06 AM
From: myadd	Respond to of 152472

"Actually GSTRF was down graded by ML at 47" I sold all of my shares @34 for a nice profit in January after going to the Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas. I used the phone...worked well.... and after looking at their rate structure, I sold immediately. Reminds me of the Ameritrade? commerical with a parrot on the new CEO's shoulder! My point is that if a novice can look at a rate plan and think that I would never pay those prices...unless I am on an oil rig, emergency standby, etc. how many other people would think the same thing? Just about everyone! After 2 other companies got it wrong...how could a new company with the advantage of better technology and mistakes of others be so flawed with their marketing plan? All those billions, great technology, rocket launches...and a bunch of idiots running the marketing plan! Get a ROPE! james