Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maui_dude who wrote (115301)	10/31/2000 8:37:04 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Maui, I was trying to get an idea of how the .13 process for AMD and Intel stack up at this point. I don't know if there is anyone who can predict this accurately. Let's just say that both companies will get there in 2001. I have no idea who will be first. However, given that Tualatin is on .13 and sledgehammer will not be on .13 until after Tualatin, suggest to me that a) either AMD is behind Intel on .13 or b) Intel is taking a lot of risk on .13 with Tualatin. Tualatin is an old P6 core that has been around for ages, so it's a good vehicle for ramping .13u process. Hammer is a completely new design. I don't know why, of all cores, you are focusing on Hammer vs. Tualatin. I think the timing of .13u will be 1. Tualatin 2. Mustang 3. P4 4. Hammer 5. Itanium with 1, 2, and 3 arriving within relatively short time period from Q2 to Q3. Joe