Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjetstream who wrote (32539)	10/31/2000 9:26:11 AM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 436258

LOL... too bad -g-

To: jjetstream who wrote (32539)	10/31/2000 9:33:39 AM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Tough love for the Porch this morning...RMBS down 10 pts premarket......rumor that INTC will dump RMBS memory by 2001........ Message 14518816 Message 14539193 Message 14539321

To: jjetstream who wrote (32539)	10/31/2000 10:31:38 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

JJ: It is rare for me to feel a bit of vindictiveness, but I took a bunch of heat from some of the RMBS lovers when I wrote that article of a few months ago (for Cantor Fitzgerald), in which I said that RMBS was a "dead duck". I noted that Intel wasn't strong enough to force RMBS down everybody's throats and that it would be forced to divorce RMBS (there were already signs of a divorce proceeding getting underway). Seeing this tulip wilt is definitely causing a tiny smile at this end. (g) Best, Earlie