Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (14007)	10/31/2000 1:20:45 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

would you have rather bought gold at 400 and own it at 263 and silver at ten and own it at 4.75 or would you rather have bought pfg @ 5 bucks ? if silver is fos, why did gates and buffett buy ?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (14007)	11/2/2000 7:40:53 AM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

<<<Now the same type of hype is going on about silver. the only difference is there is a smaller stash of pure silver in vaults, however there is a far larger finished goods inventory as jewellery and silver artifacts that get melted when the price goes very high and these constitute vaults full of silver analogous to the vaults full of gold. Bill i was replying to what you were saying ABOVE As far as other countries having hoards of silver, well, i thought mother russia had a hoard of the 'white metals' yet these do not seem to find their way on to the world markets. i'm also concerned about your comment about 'in the know' re pfg. who here knew much of anything ? where are the posters that seemed to be here when the thing was worth a fin ? sure it might be a great spec now, but i heard it was great at 10 x the price. physical silver can only go to zero on you, but this stock has nearly GONE TO ZERO, no ?