SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Big Picture - Economics and Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arik T.G. who wrote (640)10/31/2000 1:35:02 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 686
 
atg, those types of efficiencies are not directly accounted for in gross economic productivity measurements. anecdotally, it is obvious that tech produced "efficiencies." therin lies the problem.

gdp wasn't growing very fast contrary to the efficiencies people knew existed.

i think the lemonade example pointed this out. the machine drastically increased efficiency, but b/c the laid off employee remained unemployed, "productivity" for the two person community didn't budge, all else being equal.

efficiency improvement, yes. economic productivity improvement, no.

the govt would see this and say "the lemonade tastes better, so even though you sell the same amount and make the same dollars, revenues really went up 10% - now we have 10% economic productivity growth." problem is, they didn't.

let's say the guy selling the lemonade lowers his price due to external competition. the increased efficiency plus added competition will lower the 2 person community's economic productivity.

increased efficiency, yes. lowered economic productivity - absolutely.

look at dram. for a while they improved technology so much that revenues cratered and earnings turned to losses. why? a direct result of efficiency. improved efficiency led to decreased productivity.

the key is economic productivity vs physical productivity - two entirely different animals.