Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (58034)	10/31/2000 3:29:05 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

When I had my RDRAM machine, before I sent it back to Dell, I posted that RDRAM was a waste of money, as I could not see and increase in speed, and I use some heavy programs man. Take a boo at this from ZDNET today: zdnet.com SNIP: >RDRAM has been controversial because of its relatively high price and lackluster performance, as shown even on Intel's own benchmark test. Some consumers have refused to adopt the technology for those reasons.< And Tom's hardware's review of RDRAM is right on the money. It sucks. DDR SDRAM like they are using in the new high end video cards is the way to go. RDRAM review: www6.tomshardware.com RAM WARS: www6.tomshardware.com In my opinion RDRAM is history.