Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (115365)	10/31/2000 2:32:18 PM
From: sandy carter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

INTC is going down here, anyone have news tia sandy big blocks , looks institutional

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (115365)	10/31/2000 2:51:41 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Sure, Mr. glass house preacher man. You don't want to cast the first stone this time around. A wise choice for an Itanic kind of guy. As an alternative activity, maybe you could go reassure the bus people about those Intel roadmap stories. Intel is behind Rambus 100%, right T? There may be two companies that deserve to be tangled up together more than Intel and Rambus do, but I can't think of a better pair offhand.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (115365)	10/31/2000 5:02:23 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu re:Intel doesn't need to tell "white lies" to motivate the troops. I assume then that during last 2 years intel troops heard about nothing but screw-ups. BTW why is that pIII-1.13GHz chip is still listed as one of the intel products on intel webpage :-)) As I was saying for the last few months, intel investors need to kick out current management including Grove, Barret and Otellini and get someone who can do the job in the competitive environment Regards -Albert