Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (32762)	10/31/2000 6:25:18 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

i would suggest skyscrapers...or VLCC's (very large crude carriers). which may be an apt analogy seeing how the market tries to circumnavigate the oil slick... Fleck has recently mentioned that INTC will have no choice but pre-warn again.

To: Lucretius who wrote (32762)	10/31/2000 11:51:51 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 436258

<there are NO shorts left after today unless they have balls the size of houses > As far as I can tell, mine are now the size of ten city blocks. <g> I hit all my limit entries on shorts today, even the wild-ass "they'd never be stoopit enough to paint it that high" ones. I'm learning to love this ridiculous volatility. With judicious use of way-out limit entries, it can be nursed quite profitably. One must just remember to always keep the net position aligned with the long-term trend - hence my continuing net short position, and the explosion in testicle size. BC