SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oblomov who wrote (32809)10/31/2000 8:29:57 PM
From: flatsville  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Ob-

The Hays/Tilden incident could possibly qualify as a second incident...but, I have mixed feelings on that one.



To: Oblomov who wrote (32809)10/31/2000 8:42:03 PM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Hey Oblomov,, Did you see the thing in the Moscow times the other day where they were gonna send a contingency to the USof A to watch over the election.. Ho ho ho-- I think it was posted on Kitco.....



To: Oblomov who wrote (32809)11/2/2000 11:42:08 PM
From: TraderGreg  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
You got your elections mixed up...in 1884 Cleveland beat James Blaine. Blaine was a crook but had a perfect private life. Cleveland was a philanderer but had an exemplary public life. Popular vote and electoral vote both went to Cleveland.

The "almost civil war" election was 1876. Tilden beat Hayes by 3 % but there were some disputed electoral votes. The House met, appointed a 15 member bi-partisan(with 1 independent) commission to resolve the dispute. Hayes' people promised the Independent member of the Commission that Hayes would pull Union troops out of the South. The commission voted 8 to 7 to give the disputed electoral votes to Hayes.

1824--Andrew Jackson won a plurality of the popular vote and a plurality of electoral votes, but not a majority. House voted and awarded the election to JQ Adams.

TG