SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (10976)11/1/2000 8:08:42 PM
From: Dutch  Respond to of 65232
 
Bush's Soc. Sec. Plan

Bush's plan for social security makes sense
By Milton Friedman, a senior research fellow at the Hoover Institution won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976
During the next 10 years, Social Security receipts are estimated to exceed payments to Social Security recipients by $2.4 trillion. George W. Bush proposes to use about $1 trillion of that sum to finance personal retirement accounts for young workers. Does that, as Al Gore's campaign contends, "undermine Social Security" by promising "the same $1 trillion of Social Security to younger workers and the elderly at the same time"?

Not at all. Under current law, the surplus will be used to purchase back government bonds now privately held. Those bonds will constitute assets of the "trust funds," counted on to finance future payments. They can be converted to cash only by selling them back to the market. Under the Bush plan, $1 trillion of those assets will instead be held in the form of securities in personal retirement accounts. Does replacing government IOUs with private securities weaken Social Security? Quite the opposite.

The Bush plan does not affect the benefits promised to current retirees. For younger workers, the account will finance part of what otherwise would be an obligation of the trust fund. In addition, the higher yield on the personal retirement accounts will benefit both the retirees and the Social Security trust fund.

In effect, the establishment of personal retirement accounts would convert an unfunded liability of $1 trillion into a fully funded liability, which strengthens rather than weakens Social Security.



To: Voltaire who wrote (10976)11/1/2000 9:54:57 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
given the performance of the market and the economy for the last 8 years in comparison with the 8 years prior to that, i don't get your reasoning. but it doesn't much matter. i think harry s. dent is right about demographics having more to do with a booming economy than politicians. thank harry.

-polvs