Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: richard surckla who wrote (59843)	11/2/2000 9:36:13 AM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

#OT## OT Catcher... "If I were on that jury we (the jury)might still be learning about the irrefutable evidence DNA testing provides." Yes, and while you and the other jurors were discussing O.J.'s genetic fingerprint you would also be discussing in detail why the defense witnesses support the claim that crime scene samples had been contaminated or could have been planted as part of a conspiracy against Simpson. Your discussion would also include Detective Vanatter and the reasons for his carrying a sample of O.J.'s blood around with him for such a long period There's an old saying...when you suspect conspiracy, it's usually incompetence. I think this explains the "suspicious" behavior of the LAPD in the OJ case. You have to think in terms of what would have been the LAPD's motive? Its not as though it were Jim Brown, who had been a critical and outspoken advocate for African Americans and critical of the LAPD. It was OJ, who practically disowned the black community and embraced mainstream white culture. The thought of an LAPD conspiracy against him is ridiculous. Dr.Id