Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lino... who wrote (4330)	11/2/2000 11:46:53 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

Substitute the word "heterophobic" for the word "anti-female" in the above statement. I'm not sure even that word is appropriate... What we're talking about here is an equal respect for one another between men and women. Certainly women have made terrific inroads towards advancing their arguments and convincing male law makers to revise the statutes and constitution. But some have taken it to such an extreme that they have overcompensated for the past and sought to obtain MORE RIGHTS than men have. Given that civilization is a constant mental battle against a man's ingrained instincts to dominate women, and all other males, going to such an extent that women are advanced over men, there is a natural over-reaction back to the instinctive, domination over others. Again, this can be quantified in the basic premise that a women has the legal right to force a man to become a father, while he has no such reciprocal right. She can unilaterally terminate (kill) their mutual child, while he has no say in whether he wants to raise it. And that is where the abortion argument cuts to the heart of the ever-present battle between the sexes...