SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vendit™ who wrote (317)11/2/2000 1:52:33 PM
From: chomolungma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
Fired-up GOP may give Bush win

Demos admit they aren't as keen about Al Gore

By Richard L. Berke
New York Times News Service

WAUKESHA, Wis. — Of all the factors driving voters to the polls next
week, Republicans say they expect their candidate to benefit most from an
intangible advantage: Republicans are far more energized about Gov.
George W. Bush than Democrats are about Vice President Al Gore.
There is significant evidence
to back up that assertion by
Republicans, including polls,
voter interviews and
observations even of Democrats
in battleground states.
Republicans are united,
enthusiastic and perhaps more
likely to vote, not necessarily
because they think Bush is an
ideal candidate but because they
are determined to win back the
White House after eight years,
and they share a collective scorn
for the Clinton administration.
Moreover, enthusiasm on the
Democratic side has been
dampened because Democrats lack the motivation of having to take back a
White House out of their party's control and are more conflicted over their
standard bearer, Gore.
"Republicans have an enemy: They hate Clinton, so they're taking it out
on Gore," said Sen. John B. Breaux, D-La. "If you really dislike the people
you're running against, it makes it easy to get fired up."
Gov. Gray Davis of California, a Democrat, put it this way: "I
remember how we felt in 1992. We'd been frozen out for 12 years. We saw
a chance to win back the White House, and we were motivated beyond
belief. We could finally return to the promised land."
The gap in intensity between Democrats and Republicans has been
apparent all year. It explains why Republicans were far swifter than
Democrats this summer in rallying behind their nominee.
Republicans also expect to build on their traditional edge in turnout
with a massive get-out-the-vote operation, and the party is pouring tens of
millions of dollars into swamping the Democrats in voter-outreach
programs.
The Gore campaign, of course, has its own weapons in the battle
to get voters to the polls, from enormous turnout operations organized by
labor unions to potent support from African-American groups.
Yet the Democrats' worries about intensity have left the Gore campaign
trying to manufacture excitement by sending big-name entertainers and
Democratic luminaries to rallies to attract crowds and publicity.
"We're obviously trying to create a frenzy of excitement and activity
going into this last weekend going into these target states," said Michael
Whouley, Gore's top strategist at the Democratic National Committee.
"We're saturating these markets with surrogates. We have to create a sense
of excitement."
Here in this town west of Milwaukee, the Gore campaign attracted
thousands of people to a rally Monday night. However, many in the
audience — even those excitedly waving green "Gore Country" placards —
were not there for the vice president but for the opening act, the rock star
Jon Bon Jovi, who introduced "the next president of the United States."
"I wanted to see Bon Jovi," said Josh Gresl, 21, a clerk in an antiques
store. "I wish Bon Jovi was running for president. Unfortunately, it is
Gore."
While Bon Jovi helped attract a crowd, Gore, in an interview before the
event here, contended that the turnout for his appearances at other events
without celebrities had swelled. Indeed, Gore has enjoyed impressive
crowds in recent days, including an estimated 30,000 at an event last week
in Madison, Wis.
"These crowds have been very large and very enthusiastic," he said.
"And it's real. They are really fired up."
Before the rally here on Monday night, Gore excitedly dashed to the
front seat to peer out the window as his campaign bus drew close.
"Eleven-thousand, six hundred!" he exclaimed. "And they're turning people
away!" He was so impressed that he joked that he would reward his
Wisconsin campaign director, Teresa Vilmain, by appointing her secretary
of state.
Still, the contrast in energy between Democratic and Republican
partisans is unmistakable and underscored in several polls. A survey
released on Wednesday by the Pew Research Center for the People and the
Press found that nearly two-thirds of Bush voters said they strongly
supported him, while just over half of the Gore backers strongly supported
their candidate. The poll also concluded that a significant portion of
Democrats were downright demoralized. The percentage in the party that
expects a Bush victory has grown to 25 percent from 13 percent in early
October.
Another poll, conducted in late October by The New York Times and
CBS News, found that 52 percent of Bush's backers said they were
"enthusiastic" about his candidacy, while only 38 percent of Gore's
supporters said that of the vice president.

"Democrats should be scared to death that they cannot win the ground
war the way they did in '98 because of Democrats' lack of enthusiasm
about Gore," said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center.
Karl Rove, Bush's chief strategist, said the Gore campaign was smart to
try to keep President Clinton under wraps because, while he might
embolden minority voters and other hard-core Democrats, his presence
only motivates Republicans.
"He energizes our base," Rove said. "He sucks the oxygen right out of
Gore's operation, and Gore falls right back into the shadows."
Republicans are also moving aggressively to charge up Bush supporters.
At a Bush event in Milwaukee last week, Republicans filled a sports arena
and sought to create drama by darkening the hall, flashing strobe lights
and smothering the audience in balloons and confetti after Bush spoke.
Even so, Republicans seem to be having an easier time generating
excitement and interest. "I haven't seen that kind of enthusiasm since 1980,
when Ronald Reagan came and was able to energize the crowd like George
W. Bush," said Gov. Tommy Thompson of Wisconsin, a Republican. "I'm
sensing the same kind of real fervent emotional enthusiasm that we saw at
that rally. You really don't get that often. The real proof is that we can't
keep enough yard signs. We've got to raise money to print more."
Gov. Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania, a Republican, said the intensity
within his party was far more palpable than four years ago. "I consider Bob
Dole a great friend, a great American, a great patriot," he said. "The crowds
for him were fairly large. They were respectful. They were polite. But the
crowds for George are just bigger. They're more enthusiastic. You feel it."
The Bush campaign is also buoyed by a common wisdom that voters who
decide late in a race usually break against the party in the White House. In
1996, voters who made up their mind in the last few days went 38 percent
to Bob Dole and 35 percent for Clinton, according to surveys of voters
leaving polling stations. In 1992, they went 37 percent for Clinton, then the
challenger, and 33 percent for the incumbent, President George Bush. And
in 1988, 54 percent went for Gov. Michael Dukakis of Massachusetts and
44 percent for Bush, who was then vice president.

The Gore campaign countered that more undecided voters are women
— and that the vice president enjoys an edge among women.
"I don't think the conventional wisdom holds true," Whouley said. "You
look at the internals in all these polls, it's heavily women. They heavily
agree with all of Gore's positions on education. I think they're going to
break toward us."



To: Vendit™ who wrote (317)11/2/2000 1:53:44 PM
From: Nichols  Respond to of 6710
 
November 2, 2000

Electoral Scoreboard

The chart below reflects the most recent
reputable state polls conducted since 9/00
received by The Hotline, updated as new polls arrive. The number of
electoral votes is listed next to each state in parentheses.

(++) indicates a lead outside the poll's margin of error; (+) means a lead
within the margin (updated 11/2, 12:10 p.m.)

The map below indicates which candidate currently leads in the most
recent poll in each state (including leads WITHIN the margin of error).
Toss-up states indicate states with conflicting poll results and are listed as
grey.

Bush's states are colored blue, while Gore's states are red.




ELECTORAL COLLEGE TOTALS: (270 needed to win)
LEADS OUTSIDE MoE ALL LEADS
STATES EVs STATES EVs
Bush 21 149 Bush 28 239
Gore 7 67 Gore 17 244

TOSS-UPS: 55 EVs (AR, FL, ME, NH, NM and TN)

STATE BUSH GORE POLL DATE MoE
(+ indicates lead inside the MoE, ++ a lead outside)
AL (9) ++55 37 Capital Survey 10/18-20 +/- 4.7
AK (3) ++47 26 ARG 9/11-17 +/- 4
AR (6) 46 46 Opinion Res. LR 10/27-30 +/- 4
+45 41 Mason-Dixon 10/27-29 +/- 4
AZ (8) ++49 39 KAET-TV/AZ Univ. 10/19-22 +/- 4
CA (54) 40 +47 Field Poll 10/27-31 +/- 3.2
CT (8) 32 ++48 Univ. of CT 9/26-10/1 +/- 5
CO (8) ++46 37 Ciruli 10/27-30 +/- 5
DC (3) 14 ++73 ARG 9/7-11 +/- 4
DE (3) 43 +45 Mason-Dixon 10/4-5 +/- 4
FL (25) 41 +48 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
+46 44 Mason-Dixon 10/30-31 +/- 3.5
44 +49 ARG 10/30-11/1+/- 4
GA (13) +48 40 Mason-Dixon 10/12-14 +/- 4
HI (4) 29 ++57 ARG 9/5-11 +/- 4
IA (7) +44 41 PSI Poll 10/30 +/- 5
ID (4) ++56 30 Mason-Dixon 10/25-26 +/- 4
IL (22) 42 +46 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
43 +46 Mason-Dixon 10/28-30 +/- 4
IN (12) ++53 30 Market Shares 10/26-28 +/- 4
KS (6) ++55 32 ARG 9/12-15 +/- 4
KY (8) ++55 40 Bluegrass Poll 10/26-29 +/- 4
LA (9) ++52 39 Mason-Dixon 10/20-22 +/- 4
MA (12) 26 ++57 ARG 9/8-13 +/- 4
MD (10) 40 +48 Mason-Dixon 10/25-26 +/- 4
ME (4) 42 42 RKM Research 10/28-30 +/- 4
MI (18) 41 ++50 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
40 +45 Detroit News 10/30-31 +/- 5
44 +48 ARG 10/30-11/1+/- 4
MN (10) 41 +44 Mason-Dixon 10/26-27 +/- 4
MO (11) +46 43 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
MS (7) ++48 37 ARG 9/12-16 +/- 4
MT (3) ++49 37 Mason-Dixon 10/23-24 +/- 4
NE (5) ++56 31 RKM Research 10/25-27 +/- 3
NV (4) +47 43 Mason-Dixon 10/26-28 +/- 4
NH (4) +45 40 ARG 10/30-11/1+/- 4
42 +43 RKM Research 10/30-31 +/- 4.5
NJ (15) 36 +41 Gannett NJ Poll 10/26-28 +/- 4.1
35 ++47 Star Ledger 10/23-26 +/- 4.5
NY (33) 36 ++51 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 3.8
35 ++35 Princeton 10/28-31 +/- 3
36 ++50 Marist 10/29-30 +/- 4.5
NM (5) 42 42 NM State Univ. 9/26-28 +/- 4
+44 41 Mason-Dixon 9/28-30 +/- 5
NC (14) ++52 42 Research 2000 10/30-31 +/- 5
+48 41 Mason-Dixon 10/27-30 +/- 4
ND (3) ++47 35 Public Affairs 10/2-5 +/- 4
OH (21) +48 40 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
OK (8) ++51 33 Consumer Logic 9/23-10/2 +/- 3.5
OR (7) +45 41 ARG 10/20-24 +/- 4
PA (23) 41 +47 Zogby 10/29-31 +/- 4
42 +48 ARG 10/30-11/1+/- 4
RI (4) 29 ++47 Brown Univ. 10/21-22 +/- 5
SC (8) ++53 38 Mason-Dixon 10/27-30 +/- 4
SD (3) ++55 34 ARG 9/6-10 +/- 4
TN (11) +48 45 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
43 49 ARG 10/30-11/1+/- 4
TX (32) ++58 30 ARG 9/14-19 +/- 4
UT (5) ++57 29 ARG 9/8-12 +/- 4
VA (13) +49 41 Mason-Dixon 10/30-31 +/- 4
VT (3) 36 ++52 Research 2000 10/23-25 +/- 5
WA (11) 43 +45 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
WV (5) ++47 37 OH State 10/11-24 +/- 4
++46 36 Ryan-McGinn (R) 10/21-23 +/- 4
WI (11) 42 +45 Zogby 10/30-11/1+/- 4
WY (3) ++57 37 Mason-Dixon 9/16-17 +/- 5