SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ausdauer who wrote (16395)11/2/2000 2:54:14 PM
From: Jim Greif  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Aus,

A settlement is undoubtedly preferable, but lawyers rarely move toward settlement this early. I know it doesn't seem early to anyone sensible, but settlements are often reached after all the testimony is heard--just before the jury or judge gets the case.

It allows the attorneys to decide if their case went well or not.

It's a nutty system, but it's the only one we've got.

Jim



To: Ausdauer who wrote (16395)11/2/2000 8:03:42 PM
From: Craig Freeman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 60323
 
Ausdauer, re: "Still hoping this Lexar thing gets settled out of court."

IMHO, a settlement isn't likely. Sony owns a piece of LEXR and it is in Sony's interest to do anything they can to limit the value of SNDK's IP.

Japanese warfare is different than U.S. logic. They prepare endlessly and are willing to fight over extended periods ... wearing down their opponents. If necessary, they are willing to sacrifice almost anything to obtain their goals. Stockholders be damned. Quarterly reports are a nuisance. Sony is in the battle for "as long as it takes".

If the "Stick" dies like "Beta", there are several Sony execs who will be seriously reviewing their sword collections. But, if Sony can degrade SNDK's patents even a tiny bit, they will have achieved success. Don't expect Sony to give up the fight any time soon. With LEXR as their proxy, they may go on "forever".

Craig