SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (56738)11/2/2000 2:26:02 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 769670
 
red herring

Message 14693817

you are disingenuous



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (56738)11/2/2000 2:31:36 PM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The thing is that I am not worried about what GE pays. I just want to feel there is fairness and equity. I want the code trashed and start from ground zero to build a code that is fair across the board to all citizens. Someone made the point that corporations really don't pay taxes and that is true. Like a hidden value added tax they simply increase prices on their product or service to compensate for the money they have to send the government. I really believe a consumption tax would be the answer. The rate could be one that would be revenue neutral. (brings in a similar amount of money) There would need to be a safety net for the vulnerable (a rebate of based on income for the taxes paid up to some level). The two extra sweeteners you would get are the underground economy would get a little stuck and pay far more taxes with their purchases. As an aside, I was amazed a couple years ago when I visited NYC. I was shopping in a couple electronic stores and, bargaining a little, I was told if I would pay cash they would waive the sales tax. Not real fair or good. The second giant source of assistance would be foreign tourists. They would pay a lot toward funding our government. We, in Florida, have that benefit with our tourism and our sales tax. We have no state income tax because primarily of that benefit.



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (56738)11/2/2000 3:13:52 PM
From: kvkkc1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
It really doesn't bother me if he is. That's the way the tax laws are written. If Frank employed as many people as GE, he would probably be able to reduce his taxable income too. My oldest brother works for GE, so I'd rather see them pay him more than pay the gov't more.knc