SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (17413)11/2/2000 3:25:23 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I got this in e-mail from a lurker Fyodor:

Joe,

I keep hearing rumors that insist the P6-core will be around, albeit in a
somewhat modified form, for quite some time. Many of these have talked
about a P6-core with integrated memory controller. The core is small enough
that it would be a very good target for it and the performance (esp when
coupled with high fsb and DDR, which is, as far as I'm concerned, a given)
would be very intriguing.

Of course, they still need to ramp it to higher frequencies and Intel folks
seem to clam up when that particular subject comes up. I have heard,
though, that Intel plans on using it (P6 core) as their sole notebook chip
for a very, very long time.

Sincerely,

fyodor



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (17413)11/2/2000 3:36:57 PM
From: Jim McMannisRespond to of 275872
 
RE:"So when is he a whiz kid, and when is he just a kid? And what is Tom? An infantile AMDroid, or just a mere German patriot?"

I believe we've discussed this. In the case of Tom, you know where he's coming from.
OTOH, I found this really neat Intel bashing sire with .sk on the end of the URL...:.)

Jim

PS. I problem I have with all this is just why not leave the benchmarking suites everyone is using in place and let the chips fall were they may...changing now is highly suspect.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (17413)11/2/2000 5:38:58 PM
From: Daniel SchuhRespond to of 275872
 
T, you realize that Tom Pabst actually used to defend the original cacheless "Covington" Celeron as a good gaming chip? I guess you have to be a pure flack to satisfy some people. How many 1.13 ghz cumines are out in the field these days, T?