SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (115707)11/2/2000 4:49:38 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"No it's not. I assume they meant the P4 using SSE is 25% faster than a 1GHz CuMine without SSE. That's not misleading, that's expected."

If they did that they will be laughed off MP3.com.

I thought P3 supported SSE. Why would they test an SSE enabled P4 against a P3 not using SSE?

Jim



To: Elmer who wrote (115707)11/2/2000 7:42:59 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
No it's not. I assume they meant the P4 using SSE is 25% faster than a 1GHz CuMine without SSE. That's not misleading, that's expected.

(IF) what McMannis claims is true, it certainly sounds misleading to me. But, alas..... since I've been following these threads, I've come to realize there are at least three more irrefutable concepts in this world. (Elmer logic / Engel physics / and Windsock irrelevance)

THE WATSONYOUTH


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News