Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (2574)	11/3/2000 11:34:29 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 3873

Ole, I don't have an issue with the WSJ, since I do not consider them to be an authority on LVLT's business plan. I choose, like most intelligent investors, to get my information directly from the source. With all of the sloppy journalism (print and TV) that is going on these days, I am surprised that anyone gives much credence to positions espoused by the media that are in conflict with what the companies are stating. You can say that one might be a fool to believe in management's integrity, and I guess in the case of me and LVLT, you'd have to call me a fool. I am banking on this management, and I will make or lose a fortune on that. I am comfortable with their integrity and skill. If anyone needs to raise issue with the WSJ, it seems to me that it ought to be you. After all, you're the one that treats their word as gospel, and you're the one that lacks credibility as a result. Perhaps you might start quoting USA Today, instead?! <G> As I said, I have no issue with them, because I do not hold their reporting up as the end-all like some people apparently do. It is a dead issue, since I disproved, using the most direct source, the erroneous reporting of a WSJ staff writer. LoF