Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dwight martin who wrote (4256)	11/3/2000 12:32:30 PM
From: John Walliker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 197214

dwight, Yes but GPS takes too long, sometimes minutes, while SnapTrac takes ten seconds. The results I quoted only apply when the receiver has been tracking for a while - there is no doubt that snaptrac greatly enhances the ability to work in difficult locations. However, the enormous advantage that snaptrac had over ordinary GPS in otherwise good conditions has diminished through the removal of SA, the effects of which snaptrac minimised through providing differential GPS. This means that in good conditions, with the GPS receiver stabilised, there is little advantage to snaptrac. However, in poor conditions or shortly after a GPS receiver has been switched on snaptrac makes a huge difference. John