Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David C. Burns who wrote (2595)	11/4/2000 1:11:09 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 3873

OT I think that there can be compromise on all sides in that ongoing debate. LoF

To: David C. Burns who wrote (2595)	11/6/2000 7:26:09 PM
From: Yogizuna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3873

* Pretty Far Off Topic * My point is "mother nature" can destroy anything "she" wants to and the far out environmentalists only worship her even more, but god forbid we humans should disturb some "twigs in the forest" or bother some previously unknown bug's habitat, and all hell breaks loose, as if the human race was'nt part of nature itself...... Now if a volcanic eruption should completely destroy that species, you will not hear a peep or protest against "cruel mother nature"! Do you not find that rather strange? I do. We need to gain some perspective here in my opinion. After all, it was only recently that the scientific community was panicking over evidence that a "space object" was going to come crashing down on earth 20 or 30 years from now or something like that, but now new evidence places the possible crash date further off into the future..... So no matter how much we try to "save" things as they are, nature will continue to change things and even destroy, with or without the human race involved. It's depressing to some, but that is the way it is..... Yogi