SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (17603)11/3/2000 11:40:22 PM
From: AK2004Respond to of 275872
 
Tony, Carl, All
Just heard bloomberg audio where Needham said that semi probably at the bottom short of few events that rumored on the Street and one of them is intel lowering guidance.
Needhams largest position is in amd.
Regards
-Albert



To: Bilow who wrote (17603)11/4/2000 12:38:10 AM
From: Tony ViolaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Carl, >. As to what kind of a glitch, who knows, but there is no way in hell they are going to be able to fix it with a capacitor.

Carl, I was being facetious, but only partially, because an "external circuit to filter out the glitch" sure sounds like something more in the RLC world than in the digital world. The author probably doesn't know what he's talking about.

To resolve this, motherboard manufacturers will have to integrate an external circuit to filter out the glitch.

Then, you said:

If it were a problem of this sort, that would also explain why the sample boards didn't have problems. This sort of timing issue only show up when you put things into production. All in all, the sort of thing that the chip makers keep secret, and nobody gives a dang about most of the time.

Why is that? Don't they use timing analysis programs? In addition, they should have built and characterized enough prototypes, engineering models, pilots, whatever they call pre-production units to catch it. Sounds like AMD's consecutive game hitting streak just came to an end.

Tony



To: Bilow who wrote (17603)11/4/2000 5:32:26 AM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Carl, <My guess is that it is something to do with the LDT channel>

I think you've got a little misnomer there. What you are talking about is the EV6 bus, not LDT. AMD hasn't implemented LDT in any of their chipsets yet.

Tenchusatsu