SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jcholewa who wrote (17613)11/4/2000 5:27:01 AM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
JC, <You miss my point, which is that NO single test should be considered a primarily important benchmark in its class.>

Nah, I actually got your point, believe it or not. But then again, some people on this thread think that too many benchmarks will clutter a review. I don't, because I like in-depth analysis, but I think some people are still longing for the days when a few simple benchmarks were enough to paint an accurate picture of performance.

Tenchusatsu



To: jcholewa who wrote (17613)11/5/2000 1:23:19 PM
From: EricRRRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
JC-

What I really want to know is what effect a change to DDR or SDR will have on Willy performance. Intel has officially announced that rambus will only be a high end memory- and perhaps it will even wither completely. (It's not in servers, business will never use it because of upgrade difficulty, and it's too expensive for mainstream- leaving workstations and enthusiasts- is this enough to justify a fab line?)

And what is this new higher pin Willy which is coming down the line. There were rumors that it had an integrated memory controller- is that true?